Psychoeducation may affect brain plasticity in bipolar disorder

An investigation in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics explores how psychoeducation may affect white matter plasticity inbipolar disorder. Bipolar disorder (BD) is a severe mood disorder which is often difficult to treat. Pharmacological treatments are often effective in symptom management, but their effects are generally insufficient on a functional level. Among psychosocial interventions, psychoeducation has recently shown significant and long-lasting effects on treatment adherence, relapse prevention and global functioning. Psychoeducation is now positioned as an essential part of therapeutic strategies in BD, although its mechanistic neural action has not yet been precisely identified. In the present study the Authors tested the hypothesis that psychoeducation would be associated with anatomical changes of the frontolimbic connectivity in patients with BD.

Twenty-four euthymic patients with BD were randomly assigned to a 3-month psychoeducation (PED) or support (SUP) group program. Twelve HS were included to form a control (CTL) group for an initial between-group comparison. Ten patients and 10 HS had participated in a previous fMRI study with different aims. Both PED and SUP group programs were conducted in a parallel design, i.e., 12 sessions, 1 session per week, within the same period to exclude potential seasonality-induced variability.

Results showed that BD patients experienced a significant decrease in depressive symptom severity and a significant increase in global functioning after the psychoeducation but not after the SUP group. Patients of the PED group presented significantly reduced MD along the left uncinate fasciculus after the psychoeducation program compared to before whereas patients of the SUP group did not. In both patient groups, we observed no change in GFA of right and left uncinate fasciculus. There were no significant differences between BD and CTL at t1 either on GFA or on MD within both right and left uncinate fasciculus. As the Authors explain, the decrease of the MD within the left uncinate fasciculus after the psychoeducation suggests beneficial effects of psychoeducation on frontolimbic tracts. Since higher levels of MD are associated with myelin damage, a possible explanation for the observed MD change in our study is increased myelination after psychoeducation.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in News & updates. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s